Encrypted files exceeding 2GB using 32 bit systems
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:08 am
Hi All,
I was wondering if there are know limitation in de-crypting big files within a 32bit OS.
I have downloaded an *.AES file (actually a zip volume 2.3GB size) but when I try to open it, applying the password, after the long extraction (hence the PWD is correct) has been completed I get the message "Message has been altered and should not be trusted."
Can I excluded it is due to the fact I'm doing this operation with a 32 bit OS? (Windows Vista business).
It would take ages for the guy to upload it again (and also for me to download BTW ;P) so I would like to double check this possibility.
In case I need the file to be uploaded again (the file was corrupted during the upload<->download) would you suggest to:
first zip then encrypt (as was done) or viceversa? I'm specifically concerned about data consistency (upload<->download) granted by the *zip/*rar files VS *.aes
Tnk!
I was wondering if there are know limitation in de-crypting big files within a 32bit OS.
I have downloaded an *.AES file (actually a zip volume 2.3GB size) but when I try to open it, applying the password, after the long extraction (hence the PWD is correct) has been completed I get the message "Message has been altered and should not be trusted."
Can I excluded it is due to the fact I'm doing this operation with a 32 bit OS? (Windows Vista business).
It would take ages for the guy to upload it again (and also for me to download BTW ;P) so I would like to double check this possibility.
In case I need the file to be uploaded again (the file was corrupted during the upload<->download) would you suggest to:
first zip then encrypt (as was done) or viceversa? I'm specifically concerned about data consistency (upload<->download) granted by the *zip/*rar files VS *.aes
Tnk!